All I wanna do is zooma zoom zoom zoom.

Let’s take a tour of what it might look like to peer through some of the world’s most powerful and expensive camera lenses, shall we?

To set a baseline, here’s a photo of Long Island City’s Citibank building taken with a regular ‘ol Canon 17-40mm zoom lens at 22mm. You can see the full photo on the top left, and a 100%, 1:1 zoom in the center of the screen. Click it to view it at actual size. Go on, click it.

22mm lens:

And here’s a shot with my most powerful zoom lens – a Canon 70-200mm 2.8L.

200mm lens:

Now the fun begins. Let’s see how much closer we can get by shooting through a 20-60x Nikon spotting scope.

40mm lens + spotting scope @ 20x (~800mm lens):

The photo above is pretty much as close as you’d get with an 800mm lens (although, obviously, the 800mm lens would have better image quality and the edges wouldn’t be completely darkened). Canon makes an 800mm lens and you can pick one up for a cool $11,000 at Adorama.

So let’s move on to 1200mm territory.

40mm lens + spotting scope @ 30x (~1200mm lens):

If you wanted to take the above photo without the black edges and degraded image quality, you could pick up Canon’s 1200mm, $120,000 lens from B&H. It’s the largest lens Canon makes and you can read more about it here.

Let’s get closer…

40mm lens + spotting scope @ 42.5x (~1700mm lens):

The photo above approximates the focal length of the world’s largest telephoto lens, made by Carl Zeiss. Badass.

100mm lens + spotting scope @ 20x (~2000mm lens):

Now we’re at 2000mm. Nikon made a 2000mm lens using mirrors a while back.

200mm lens + spotting scope @ 20x (~4000mm lens):

Somewhere between these two focal lengths is Canon’s insane 5200mm lens. You can read more about it here, here, and here.

100mm lens + spotting scope @ 60x (~6000mm lens):

To get any closer, someone once took Canon’s 1200mm lens and paired it with a 7.2x crop factor video camera to create a 8640mm focal length.

200mm lens + spotting scope @ 60x (~12000mm lens):

And there you have it – an example of how close you’d get with a 12000mm lens. Judging from the focal-length-to-price ratio of Canon’s 1200mm lens, getting a crystal clear full-frame shot of the Citibank building this close would run you $1,200,000. And that’s all I have to say about that.

Comments (19)

  1.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    nice zoom :D

  2.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    All I can say is, HOLY CRAP!

  3.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Compare that to observatory telescopes, who have their focal lengths measured in METERS! The hubble is something like 57.6m so its a 57600mm lens!

  4.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Helicopter ride to get really close; £ 300.- and shoot it with a 17-55 2.8 having an fun day for free.

    ;-)

  5.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    I agree with Ron. Not only the picture will cost a little more than (let’s say)300 pounds, but the picture will be crisper than the original shot where the bank is just a spec in the window!

  6.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Reminds me of http://frupic.frubar.net/11874

  7.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Um. WAAAAAAWWWW… I’m like… WAAAAAAAAAAWWWWW. I want one.

  8.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    ~Very Cool~

  9.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Cool.

    I played with a Sigma 400-1000mm and a 550d:

    http://www.verrekijkershow.nl/13/sigma-200500-mm-f28/

    around 11000mm ….

  10.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    ohwooww!be careful, there are people watching you!;p distractions could be dangerous!use clothes!

  11.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    I’d imagine camera shake would be a bitch at the longer focal lengths!

  12.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    My vote goes to the 550D and Sigma 400-1000mm, 3 comments up from here.

  13.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Shargan ducser brerbereshoff ajmirendd ry majdeva armuchnamia.

  14.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    You don’t need a $ 1 200 000
    equipement to do this….the only thing what you need is a swarovski observation telescope, a tripod, the right adapter for the camera and a tiny little compact camera like a kodak m320.

  15.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    Great site…found it by accident through Dave Hill online

  16.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    O.O

    (goin’ on my christmas list)

  17.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    At what point does it stop being a lens, and starts being a telescope?

  18.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    for what this lense 1200mm ! it dosen’t matter 300mm is enough .

  19.  Rate Comment Up Rate Comment Down  error|1

    i have one question how many servants need to taking only just one picture?!

Leave a Reply