June 27th, 2008
Very interesting how similar “No Country for Old Men” is to “Raising Arizona.” See for yourself…
UPDATE - I just made a video comparison of one of the trailer scenes. View it on YouTube here.
Very interesting how similar “No Country for Old Men” is to “Raising Arizona.” See for yourself…
UPDATE - I just made a video comparison of one of the trailer scenes. View it on YouTube here.
Mike Solomon lives in New York City where he works as Creative Director at Snooth.
Recent Wines
nice screencaps. check out an essay i wrote comparing the iconography of the two films through the lens of genre here:: http://midnightglobe.livejournal.com/188647.html
-jon
06.27.08 at 11:38 am
Oh my goodness. Both movies had pictures of guys at desks, driving cars, and working at stores!
06.27.08 at 1:47 pm
My thoughts exactly, Derek. What a complete non-post, and why on earth did Daring Fireball think it was worth linking to?
06.27.08 at 1:55 pm
Raising Arizona is my favorite all-time movie, and when I first saw No Country For Old Men, I was struck by these parallels too. I was convinced that the Coen Brothers were making deliberate references to their earlier work. I guessed that they even had this in mind when they were making casting decisions.
I’m glad another fan out there had the same feeling.
06.27.08 at 2:03 pm
I see no similarities in the images above. Is this a humor post?
06.27.08 at 2:19 pm
@Derek I really hope that you are trying to make some profound comment on the entire intelligent design vs evolution debate.
Not being able to see similarities between the screencaps makes you stupid, not the post.
06.27.08 at 3:01 pm
Wow, it is almost like the two films had the same directors, with the same visual style…oh, wait.
06.27.08 at 4:40 pm
Nifty, and I do find these nuances interesting - but you could do the same thing with a myriad of other films, made with the same director or without. Also, look at the Tim Burton Batman/The Dark Night “trailer” - you’d think the same thing was going on :o)
06.27.08 at 6:18 pm
So is this a case of meaningful back references to RA and a matching of stories as well as matching shots?
Or is it just No Ideas for Old Filmmakers?
Or perhaps just silly games for filmmakers?
06.27.08 at 9:43 pm
Don’t forget Chigur’s shooting the bird off the bridge. Like LBOTA, he was “especially hard on the little things”
06.27.08 at 10:24 pm
The internet is a rocky place where your wit can find no purchase.
06.28.08 at 4:17 am
UPDATE - check the video link near the top of the post.
06.28.08 at 9:26 am
Everbody is so kind and gentle here. I really fail to see how the Bros. Cohen can plariarize there own work…every shot has it’s own dynamics (dolly, crane, stready cam etc.And i totally fail to see the similarities between the 2 movie’s. I’ll try to be nice also….you don’t know squat about cimema.
06.28.08 at 9:48 am
I was just thinking that all those shots were in The Big Lebowski and Fargo also.
06.29.08 at 9:28 pm
The Coens have always quoted their own stuff a lot. My favorite is the similarity between John Turturro begging for his life in Miller’s Crossing and Jim True begging for his job in The Hudsucker Proxy, because the effect of the two scenes is so different.
06.30.08 at 9:01 am
This post has me thinking of the long tradition in music of sneaking in little quotes of other bits of music into another work. This happens in jazz a lot, and it’s not a theft of ideas, nor a dearth of new ideas, nor mere accident. Rather, it’s a deliberate game that musicians play, that one might well call “Did You See What I Just Did There?”
It’s not limited to jazz, of course: The Beatles quoted “All You Need Is Love” at the end of “Love Love Me Do”. Sting, at the end of “Love is the Seventh Wave” quoted “Every Breath You Take” by The Police, adding a bit of humor by turning it into the line “Every Cake You Bake”. Scott Miller (of Game Theory and The Loud Family) throws in little quotes of other artists and himself all the time, and insiders familiar with his work typically love to discover them in the work.
I wonder why, in film, this practice is much less well received (to the point of people denying its actual existence!) even in the face of pretty good documentation of it. Especially in the case of films by the Coen Brothers such as Raising Arizona which, like a fine albums, bear repeated listenings so well.
I suspect that those who don’t get it, and don’t even recognize it, are simply not as intimate with the work as those who do.
06.30.08 at 9:39 am
But here’s in interesting note. Wasn’t NCFOM written by Cormac Mccarthy long after RA was made? (RA was released in 1987 and NCFOM was released in 2006). Since the movie was so true to the book, could it be inferred that Cormac Mccarthy was echoing parts of RA?
06.30.08 at 9:50 am
Excellent question. I guess the reason that I attribute it to the brothers Coen instead of McCarthy is that these are all either visual or in terms of the structure of some small section of the screenplay. Or, even discounting that, I suppose that a filmmaker, when considering what book to bring to the big screen, might be selecting work that lends itself well to what the filmmaker would like to achieve.
Maybe another little piece of evidence is how Javier Bardem’s character in NCFOM is used to parallel both the Lone Biker Of The Apocalypse and H.I. McDunnough. I suppose I would expect a more one-to-one mapping between characters if it were conceived by the McCarthy instead. I’m not sure why I think that, or whether it’s compelling.
But I do find it interesting. :-)
06.30.08 at 10:06 am
Oops…I just realized I got the Beatles songs wrong: They quoted “She Loves You” at the end of “All You Need Is Love”.
I’m sure one could find examples in Pink Floyd as well.
06.30.08 at 10:24 am
Also, note that both films are set in the same time period. I think it’s very possible the Coen brothers went back and looked at RA when working on the set design for NCFOM.
06.30.08 at 10:48 am
What’s great about the similarities between the two films is that they are not even from the same genre, and yet these parallel characters work in each movie. The similarities go way beyond just visual style - they are almost the same archetype (if that’s the right term) in each film, e.g. the badasses in the films are both indifferent grim reapers; the shopkeepers are both submissive (but not stupid) elderly men; the arrogant, wealthy Southwestern businessmen…
Great post. Great movies.
07.05.08 at 12:47 am
I saw both films and my mom got scared And said, “You’re movin’ with your auntie and uncle in Bel-Air.”I whistled for a cab and when it came near The license plate said fresh and it had dice in the mirror If anything I could say that this cab was rare But I thought, “Nah, forget it. Yo home to Bel-Air!” I pulled up to the house about 7 or 8and I yelled to the cabby yo holmes smell ya later Looked at my kingdom I was finally there To sit on my throne as the prince of Bel-Air.
07.28.08 at 11:18 pm
For me the most striking thing about the similarities is the striking difference between the movies. Despite relying on a similar visual style and including some intentionally identical shots, No Country is so different from Raising Arizona. While the older movie is totally funny and also touching (the perfect ‘Hilarious and touching’ film perhaps), the rather is its opposite: very serious and absolutely grim. This to me is really just a sign of effortless genius. The jazz example someone mentioned above (’See what I did there?’) is keen.
08.03.08 at 1:29 am
qdivcgvjcnqtdpkbwell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how’s life? hope it’s introduce branch ;)
12.28.08 at 2:13 pm